AI workflow systems for operations teams · Remote-first across the US

Stop paying people to move information between systems.

Bring us one recurring workflow — documents, an inbox, lead intake, or knowledge nobody can find. We map it, build a working version around the tools you already run, and in two to six weeks your own staff are using it on real work. Then you decide whether it deserves a full rollout. If it doesn’t, we say so.

See the work

638,184

Parcels scored in one statewide model

1.55M

Clinical records processed

$2.57M

Revenue placed under measurement

2.6×

Measured lift on one client's best channel

If your data cannot leave

We can build it so nothing you own ever leaves your building.

Most “chat with your data” tools work by sending your records to somebody else’s server. For a lot of businesses that is the end of the conversation — patient files, client records, anything under contract.

We have built the other kind. A government client needed 637,000 property records searchable in plain English, on hardware they controlled, with nothing leaving the building. The model ran on their own machine and answered from real database queries rather than guesswork, so it could not invent a record that was not there.

How we build private AI
Records made searchable in plain English
637,358
Records made searchable in plain English
Sent to any outside service
Zero bytes
Sent to any outside service
No third-party API in the loop
On your hardware
No third-party API in the loop

Selected work

The numbers, the method, and what we got wrong

Clients are described by sector and scale rather than named. Every figure is real.

Consumer & Beverage

Turning foot traffic into take-home revenue

185 products, 22 months and $2.57M of transactions — reconciled, normalised for footfall, and turned into a tap list that pays for itself.

Take-home sales lift when a product is on tap
2.6×
Take-home sales lift when a product is on tap
Products analysed across 22 months
185
Products analysed across 22 months
Read the case study

Public Sector & Real Estate

638,000 parcels, ranked down to 100 they could actually buy

Every parcel in the state scored on the same 45 measures, so that “which property should we buy next?” finally had an answer that did not depend on who walked in the door.

Parcels scored
638,184
Parcels scored
Ownership records reconciled
249,034
Ownership records reconciled
Read the case study

Public Sector

637,000 sensitive records, searchable in plain English — on their own hardware

The obvious tool was off the table, because sending government property and owner records to somebody else’s server was never going to be approved.

Records made searchable
637,358
Records made searchable
Sent to any outside service
Zero bytes
Sent to any outside service
Read the case study

Healthcare

1.5 million clinical readings, reduced to eight numbers a monitor already has

Sepsis kills faster the longer it goes unnoticed, and the standard bedside scores catch it late. The question was whether the machines already in the room hold enough signal.

Hourly readings processed
1,552,210
Hourly readings processed
Clinical measures assessed
43
Clinical measures assessed
Read the case study

Healthcare policy

540 model runs for a 0.42% gain. We told them to stop

The job was predicting how long patients stay in hospital. The honest finding was that the data had nothing more to give.

Model versions tested
540
Model versions tested
Improvement over the untuned baseline
+0.42%
Improvement over the untuned baseline
Read the case study
Drag or swipe

How the first engagement works

Map, build, test, decide — in two to six weeks

01

Map

We sit with the people who do the work, follow one process end to end, and find where it actually stalls — usually somewhere nobody has looked at in years.

02

Build

We build a working version against your real tools and your real data. Not a mock-up, and not a slide.

03

Test

Your own staff run it on live work for a week. Edge cases surface here, which is the point of doing it small.

04

Decide

You decide whether it earns a full rollout. If it does not, we say so — and you have spent weeks, not quarters, finding out.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

What you are not signing up for

The parts people worry about

You keep your existing tools

We build around your email, CRM, spreadsheets and accounting software. No migration, no new platform to learn.

Private deployment available

Where data cannot leave the building, it does not. On your hardware, no third-party API in the loop.

One workflow, not a transformation

The first engagement is bounded on purpose: one process, two to six weeks, one decision at the end.

If it is not worth building, we say so

We have told clients to stop. It costs us a project and keeps the relationship, which is the better trade.

Next step

Find the first workflow worth automating

Bring one process, inbox, document type or bottleneck. We’ll tell you whether it is worth building — and what a first pilot would look like.

What happens next

  • You pick the workflow. We ask what already exists, who touches it, and where it stalls.
  • We reply within one business day with a rough shape and a rough timeline — usually smaller than people expect.
  • If it makes sense, the next step is a working system in two to six weeks, tested by your own staff.
  • You keep your existing tools. Private deployment is available where data cannot leave.
  • And if it is not worth building, we say so instead of selling you one.